Page 1 of 1 1
Topic Options
#1028863 - 02/20/11 08:15 PM mackie proFX 8 vs Allen & Heath Zed 10 FX - comments?
dhart Offline
Planeteer


Registered: 12/19/01
Posts: 569
Loc: albany, ny
I just sold my 10 yr old mackie 16 channel board today; my band sort of fell apart and it's way too much to carry to a solo or duo gig. Anyone have any experience with either of these? I hear the Mackie's USB port is noisy, though I don't necessarily need it for that. The A&H is a bit more pricey, around $300 vs around $230 for the Mackie. Unnecessary to spend more? Stupid to buy the cheaper board? Experience/advice appreciated.
Top
#1028884 - 02/21/11 01:19 AM Re: mackie proFX 8 vs Allen & Heath Zed 10 FX - comments? [Re: dhart]
Doofie Offline
Doofie
Planeteer


Registered: 04/04/02
Posts: 6933
Loc: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
I love our ZED 428 but I'm not convinced it is as well made as our Mackie mixers. We have three. I had to send back four shipments because of damage before I accepted our current ZED 428. I've already sent it back once for warranty repair and now I have an issue with a stereo track's rca input. I'm wondering about the quality of the workmanship in these Asian made units. Still, lots of versatility and great sound.

Good luck with you choice.
_________________________
Love, it's something we do.

I'm David McMillan. My friends call me Chuck.

Top
#1028909 - 02/21/11 10:11 AM Re: mackie proFX 8 vs Allen & Heath Zed 10 FX - comments? [Re: Doofie]
dhart Offline
Planeteer


Registered: 12/19/01
Posts: 569
Loc: albany, ny
Thanks Doofie. I had thought the Mackies were road warriors, and never had a problem with mine, but I've seen some reveiws online talking about reliability issues. Guess I'll go take a look and go with gut instinct (and that may be heavily weighted towards the price).
Top
#1028922 - 02/21/11 11:25 AM Re: mackie proFX 8 vs Allen & Heath Zed 10 FX - comments? [Re: dhart]
Ken Sheehan Offline
Planeteer


Registered: 10/10/03
Posts: 4740
Loc: New York
might want to check Soundcraft too.
_________________________

Top
#1028986 - 02/21/11 04:51 PM Re: mackie proFX 8 vs Allen & Heath Zed 10 FX - comments? [Re: Ken Sheehan]
dhart Offline
Planeteer


Registered: 12/19/01
Posts: 569
Loc: albany, ny
I looked at the Soundcraft EFX8 today, very nice but $120 more than the Mackie I ended up getting. I went for the proFX 12 for $279, vs $399 for the Soundcraft. Probably should have just gotten the Mackie 8 but I was afraid I wouldn't have enough non-stereo lines on occasion and for a few bucks and not much more size or weight it seemed the thing to do. We'll see how it works out.
Top
#1029045 - 02/21/11 11:25 PM Re: mackie proFX 8 vs Allen & Heath Zed 10 FX - comments? [Re: dhart]
flatcat Administrator Offline
Planeteer


Registered: 07/11/01
Posts: 22364
Loc: Westborough, MA, USA
I have an older A&H board that I absolutely love. A MixWizard 20:4:2.

That said: I still use my old Mackie MS1202 I bought in the mid-90s.
_________________________
Professor Truth T. Sweetness says,"Mind your manners!"

Top
Page 1 of 1 1


Moderator:  Wish 
Hop to:
Shout Box

Who's Online
6 registered (mike gouthro, Liquidirt, Infinitymobile, Mattfig, C Jo Go*Crystal Studios*, Mooseboy) and 87 anonymous users online.
Top Posters
47658
Jazzooo
43828
Al
40001
Silversmith
37710
Timster
32942
Tom Mix
28640
NOK
26732
Ismellelephant
26224
gonzo
25442
Popmann
25139
Doughboy
23693
Mooseboy
23691
paulb
23433
moontan
22961
RGR
22364
flatcat
21238
Marty Gilman
21125
fonts
19598
vvvm
19327
Gretsch 6120
19268
String Jammer
18923
T57Strat
18919
Vanillagrits
18822
glennsimonds
18791
Jammer
18640
GAMBLE
18601
C Jo Go*Crystal Studios*
17825
fabulousthunderbird
17600
GAWZDigitalUnderground
17522
Geo
17209
SteveW
17171
Hano
16175
Delso
15818
LakeStone Karl
15620
JazAddict
14958
virtualan
14908
kid-surf
14723
Dan Barnes
14626
Dave Morris
14445
Liquidirt
Forum Stats
20467 Members
30 Forums
129593 Topics
1488735 Posts

Max Online: 226 @ 03/21/16 07:30 AM
Newest Members
lweiss, AntoineJ, Lew, roxy64, m1cha3l
20467 Registered Users

Generated in 0.021 seconds in which 0.015 seconds were spent on a total of 13 queries. Zlib compression disabled.